3… 2… 1… ACTION!

   The air is thick and weighing on your lungs. The skyscrapers seem desolate and hollow. The rare pedestrians seem desolate and hollow. The ground, a cement slab, reaching beyond the horizon. The clouds brace together, amassing to overtake the sunlight. Nothing gives the impression of life. Nothing rustles but for the moans of metal. The city anticipates a spark, an ignition of vitality. Anticipates action. Something must break tempo. Something must be the change.

   And Suddenly,

   a hum can be identified through the air waves, passing through barriers of iron and glass. It vibrates, encircling me on both sides, all the more approaching with every second that passes. Soon, the prospects appear on both sides of the spectrum. Two massive automobiles racing towards each other. But it is immediately noticed that one of the contestants is not as confident, the chicken of the two, internally debating if life is sacred enough to not be squandered upon such a rash decision. It truly was not do or die. 
  The cars dig up the concrete while inching nearer and nearer. 
  The silence is palpable.
  Emotion is tense.
  Livesontheline.
  Destruction
  IS 
  ABOUT 
  TO

  At the last second, one of the cars pulls off the course of devastation and barley slides by, choosing to grasp life, leaving the anticipating city once more anticipating.


So was the distraughting scene in my physics class today. With the exception of some minor changes. Small buggy cars that traveled a total distance of 400 cm, nonchalantly crossing at 228cm with an inch of space between. Collision was the desired outcome, but the buggies had minds of their own and chose to veer from the plan.

credits

Cast:   car 11

        car 12

Crew(Behind-the-Scene-People-that-made-the-awesomely-cool-close-to-death-experience):

      Sahil

       Collin

          Katherine

      Candy

        Damaris

Special Effects: Apple app

Sound Effects:   Marty

Lighting:  UAIS physics classroom ceiling lightbulbs

Soundtrack:  Intensity and Disappointment

2- 4=|2| ; Not in Displacement

      As a class, we had to complete a packet on velocity vs. time and displacement, and draw on a whiteboard a question, off of the packet, that was assigned to us. Then, we discussed the problems with the class. Not a large number of people talked, but the discussion did clear up a couple questions that I've had. I learned how to write a mathematical expression that shows the relationship between velocity and time. Another thing I learned was the velocity vs. time graph shows the displacement of an object through the distance traveled during an allotted time. Also, I learned that displacement can be negative, not only positive, or absolute value as I had thought. Lastly, displacement does not have to be measured from the reference point. The reference point is just a way to prove that an object was moving in relation to others things in its surroundings. But, displacement can be measured by subtracting final point from initial point. 
   I felt that this was a good day in physics, not trying to say that everyday in physics isn't good.

Catching Speed

I've decided to make a part A and B on this post to recompense for not blogging last week.
         

      Last week, My physics class had a whiteboard discussion on motion maps. It arose a lot more confusion than clarity. I was not very certain of what I knew any longer. Many of my classmates thought that the discussion got us no where. But I think that it arose interest in finding the correct way to make a motion map.

     We did agree that the dot is position and the arrows are velocity(speed and direction).

             Here is what a motion map looks like:

   The next class meeting, we established that the dot represented an object at a certain interval of time. The arrows represented the direction and speed an object was moving. The slower the speed, the shorter the arrows. And vice versa.  For example, take B in the picture. It is going in the positive direction at a higher speed than all the other objects.

     Another big thing we spent some time on was velocity graphs. I learned that they show direction and speed, but it does not matter if they are negative from the reference point if they are moving in the positive direction. Sorry for being vague. This is hard to explain with words, but easier to grasp when some one demonstrates.

   I feel that I am getting better at physics. I'm catching speed.

Dolphin Clicks

      In class today, we talked about the bicyclist worksheet and did an experiment to measure velocity, displacement, and test the graphs on the bicyclist worksheet. The class discussion began with asking which bicyclist was riding faster, A or B? A was the answer because it had a steeper slope comparative to B. The only thing that changed in the graph was the velocity of bicyclist A. Velocity is the speed and direction at which an object moves. In the first graph, bicyclist A was moving away from the reference point, while in the second graph, it was moving back towards the reference point. Somebody in my class identified the two graphs together as absolute value, but I still don't understand why it would be that. 
    Mr. Bataglia clarified some things and told us that if the line goes negative, it just means that it has passed the reference point. That helped explain my question on my previous entry. The second thing Mr. Bataglia told our class was change in position = displacement. So, if a I were to walk ten feet away from this computer and five feet back, my total distance would be fifteen feet, but my displacement from this computer would be five feet.
   Next, we split up into our buses groups and did an experiment based off of what we recently learned. The groups used sonar machines that recorded your position by sending out sonars, computers to see the data, dora (Xplorer), and some wires. The first trial was not successful at all, because we were walking by it, not towards it. But the second trial worked out well. My partner walked way, then towards the sonar machine. The third time she walked at a faster speed making the graph steeper than the second trial. The interesting thing though was that the velocity did not change both times. That stumped my group. It was an interesting experiment. I'm glad our class is revisiting it on monday. Hopefully we'll get an answer about the velocity situation.